bhops
Last of the famous international screw ups.
Not really being that the Q Anon aspect hasn't been discussed in any depth for about 650 pages.
It’s not about politics
- Thread starter Layne
- Start date
Malarkey
no pasarán 🌹
Don't be daft.
Cornflakes
"A bit iffy" ★★☆☆☆ - AV Club
That doesn't stop it being the qanon thread.
Malarkey
no pasarán 🌹
bhops
Last of the famous international screw ups.
No but the premise is that 750 pages have been devoted to Q Anon whereas even a cursory look over the thread will disprove this relatively easily.
nicky wire's legs
Christ is king!
From the sea to the river, God will deliver! 
nicky wire's legs
Christ is king!
Lucifer Sam
الموت لأمريكا
The Jews are the indigenous people of Israel? For someone representing a church group, he should read his bible first.
nicky wire's legs
Christ is king!
It's the land given them by God himself. Don't be jealous that the only patch of land God ever gave you was your big bald head, audrey.
According to who, can you remind us?
Anyway, here’s a Twitter account doing a great job at exposing sicko Zionists (and in some cases getting them suspended or fired from their jobs). It’s astonishing that the people documented here think they can get away with saying these things without consequences; salivating over genocide while using their real names. They’re not just weirdos sitting in basements either, we’re talking about professionals/business owners/politicians.
Last edited:
Lucifer Sam
الموت لأمريكا
Even if you believe that nonsense, it was a case of God giving it to them by telling them to drive out the inhabitants of the land. That makes them not indigenous. And anyway, how did they thank him? They crucified J-dogg! For the crime of deicide, God willed it that the Romans should destroy the temple and expel them.
Time was when you Christians used to think the Jews bore a curse because they were Christ-killers: "his blood be upon us, and on our children!" Not anymore, though. Mix some goofy Protestant eschatology and some gun-toting Zionist barbarism, and suddenly you're philo-Semites of the worst kind. Ben Shapiro and Noa Tishby? Bah! Terrible, terrible Jews. We're a long way from the likes of Spinoza and Kafka anymore.
Last edited:
nicky wire's legs
Christ is king!
i think you'll find it was the romans what crucified j-dogg, my friend! and we dont hate the romans for that, do we?
besides, j-dogg himself was a jew, so if you denounce the jews isnt that tantamount to denouncing j-dogg? and i know you would never do that, audrey, because in your heart of hearts, audrey, no one can take the place of j-dogg, isnt that right? well he WAS sexy, so i dont blame you.
what do you have against noa tishby exactly?
Lucifer Sam
الموت لأمريكا
I think you’ll find that’s inaccurate. It was the Jews who arrested him and wanted him put to death. Pilate told the Jews he found no fault in J-dogg, offered them Barabbas as a better option, and washed his hands of responsibility. The Jews willfully took the blame: “his blood be upon us.” The Romans were merely the instruments of execution, not the deciders.
J-dogg like Spinoza was a heretical Jew denounced by the religious authorities, which is part of what makes him interesting. If he was alive today he would probably be one of the good Jews unaffected by the grotesque mind virus of Zionism. I doubt he’d be much fussed about land since after all he said his kingdom was not of this world. I don’t know what he looked like, but I don’t remember “sexy” from the gospels. He may’ve been bald for all we know.
My only frame of reference is the few Twitter videos you posted, but she seems like an awful, high-strung, arrogant propagandist.
Last edited:
nicky wire's legs
Christ is king!
Well, why the heck did THEY want him dead?! What'd he ever do to them? It makes no sense!
Oh no, he was defo sexy, with long luscious hair. How could Mary Magdalena have washed his hair with her feet if he were bald, hmmmmmmm? Tell me that, O learned bald man!! I bet if j-dogg were alive today he could be a member of suede.
Yeah, but she's dazzling!!
nicky wire's legs
Christ is king!
But actually, no, noa tishby isn't arrogant at all. She is an impassioned defender of her people and speaks only truth. I'm surprised that's how you perceive her. And if you were filming yourself while missiles were flying in the background, you'd probably sound high strung too, dude.
Lucifer Sam
الموت لأمريكا
He dared to go against their mainstream program and called them out on their hypocrisy. The Jews could really use someone like J-dogg today instead of a lockstep, unreflective Noa Tishby, but they’d probably call him a traitor and an anti-Semite and crucify him all over again. “Christ, you know it ain’t easy … ”
ForgotHowIGotMyName
Well-Known Member
Exactly this. If someone snitches on you to the police, you don't get mad at the police. You get mad at the snitch.
gashonthenail
You will own nothing and you will be happy...
That's highly speculative, Aubs. The historical evidence for Jews being the main ethnic group in that area of the Levant is overwhelming, the first and second temple, the destruction of Jerusalem and expulsion of the Jews etc. There is little evidence that Jesus even existed.
If he did, the fact that he was crucified suggests that it was indeed the Romans that he angered. Crucifixion was viewed as a 'pagan' form of execution and a violation of Jewish law. Stoning to death was the biblical execution for blasphemy.
CRUCIFIXION - JewishEncyclopedia.com
Complete contents the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia.
Lucifer Sam
الموت لأمريكا
That's highly speculative, Aubs. The historical evidence for Jews being the main ethnic group in that area of the Levant is overwhelming, the first and second temple, the destruction of Jerusalem and expulsion of the Jews etc. There is little evidence that Jesus even existed.
If he did, the fact that he was crucified suggests that it was indeed the Romans that he angered. Crucifixion was viewed as a 'pagan' form of execution and a violation of Jewish law. Stoning to death was the biblical execution for blasphemy.
CRUCIFIXION - JewishEncyclopedia.com
Complete contents the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia.jewishencyclopedia.com
Sure, the particulars of Jesus are speculative. That’s all they can be: the gospels are our best evidence for Jesus, and they’re internally unreliable, and inconsistent with each other. This doesn’t rule out the ruling class of Jews compromising with the Romans as the means to an end. Certainly not the Pharisaic faction: they were already the priestly puppets of the client state. It’s not a stretch to suppose the gospels correct when describing them as lax and legalistic—always finding a clever loophole in the law to justify themselves. They might not’ve been fastidious about crucifixion if it could get them rid of a messianic nuisance.
One thing that isn’t speculation is the Jews were not the indigenous people of Palestine. It isn’t just the Bible admitting it: it’s also in archeology and even the etymology of place names: Hebrew names are much later attested to than Syrophoenician ones. In terms of the civilization there, the original inhabitants were pagan Canaanites, not monotheistic Jews.
The only question is where the Jews came from. They could’ve been more or less local. It may be that the Habiru, the neighborhood roughnecks and nomads, were the Hebrews. Yahweh might’ve been their god of war who they promoted to the position of father-god and began to worship exclusively. Or they could’ve been migrant Berbers who picked up their monotheism from Akhenaton and moved east after the Egyptian cult died. It’s a mystery.
