Wow Samsa, the person who believes 30,000 Palestinians deserved to die because ātheyāre uglyā thinks you made some good points, you must really be onto something! Sheās the pettiest person on this forum and sheās willing to side with people she doesnāt particularly care for if theyāre arguing with someone who sheās annoyed with at that particular moment. Completely unprincipled, she was never the most thoughtful person but after her comments about Israel/Palestine not one word from her is worth anything, so letās just establish that right out of the gate.
Contrary to what she claimed, no good points were made in the above post. Itās difficult for me to find the energy to reply to it because, forgive me, Iām already bored, so Iām going to try to make this as brief as possible. I donāt think anything particularly insightful was said which requires an extended explanation, it was just āthe usualā post from you when youāre writing to me.
This is not true. Tell us how you āknowā it. I think it was something The Truth said years ago and you settled on it as an established fact. No āstalkingā goes on and I donāt āmonitorā anyoneās āevery moveā. As for keeping tabs on what people say dating back many years, thereās this marvellous thing called the human brain which has the power to recall facts, you donāt even have to input files, it stores all the information itself whether you want it to or not. Being in possession of a brain that recalls things people say is creepy
. Along with that, thereās also the siteās search function which I believe you only learned the existence of recently. With that, I donāt even need to have a precise memory of which thread a post was made in or on what date; having only a vague recollection of something that was said is sufficient! So theyāre my secret powers: human brain and search function. I āknowā you can be a bit slow on the uptake so hopefully that has cleared things up for you.
Iāve said before I stopped making an effort with my posts after I read the excremental poetry of Baz and TheSmiths_1985. That lowered my standards, perhaps I should thank them. Prior to that I was from the BrummieBoy school of āif youāre going to write something, at the very least make it worth readingā. Now I tend not to concern myself with āeffortā!
Call it a hunch. Maybe you write Romantic era style poetry, that seems like something ācreativeā you might like to try to do, and I
shiver thinking about what that might be like.
Iāve read your posts and know what youāre about, you made it clear before that you didnāt read my posts, so no itās not the exact same thing. Itās the difference between not saying anything outlandish when you criticise someone because youāre basing your criticisms on what theyāve actually said (and had the audacity to remember it), and saying things like āyou stalk several users and monitor their every moveā because you donāt have a clear picture of who youāre talking about and instead resort to generalisations and hearsay. When you later find out your generalisations were wrong you say āhey, this person isnāt so bad after all!ā, but it was never that person who was fault, it was you making claims about their character when you had very little information to go on. Iām basing this on things I have
seen you say. You donāt have the best instincts, if you donāt mind my saying. This post has gone on for longer than Iād hoped it would; can I go now??
There are limits to how many inane arguments one can have with a certain group of strangers online (or at least there should be), and Iāve had my fill. Surely you have as well.
