Codreanu you really should vote Democrat next time

[seriously flawed - not right in the head]

I do believe the only reason you feel alliegance to the Republican party is their stance on abortion.

Is that correct?

I too, feel abortion is totally abhorrent and especially the way in which they are extending the term of weeks. I honestly do.

However, if you really do want to make changes, especially in the "inequalities in the middle east", the only way forward is voting Democrat.

However, I am sad to say, they are only slightly less right wing than the Republicans.

In all honesty, in your nation, it really doesn't matter.

Ronald McDonald holds the Ace anyway.

No offence meant, but you know what I mean.

 

[Codreanu]

> I do believe the only reason you feel alliegance to the Republican party
> is their stance on abortion.

> Is that correct?

> I too, feel abortion is totally abhorrent and especially the way in which
> they are extending the term of weeks. I honestly do.

> However, if you really do want to make changes, especially in the
> "inequalities in the middle east", the only way forward is
> voting Democrat.

> However, I am sad to say, they are only slightly less right wing than the
> Republicans.

> In all honesty, in your nation, it really doesn't matter.

> Ronald McDonald holds the Ace anyway.

> No offence meant, but you know what I mean.

I, vote Democrat! Mind your tongue, woman!

No, usually there is some third party nominee or other that I find to be more ideologically congenial, or that I can at least vote for in better conscience.
Not that they ever have a ghost of a chance...

 

[seriously flawed - not right in the head]

> I, vote Democrat! Mind your tongue, woman!

> No, usually there is some third party nominee or other that I find to be
> more ideologically congenial, or that I can at least vote for in better
> conscience.
> Not that they ever have a ghost of a chance...

Well at least over here we have the "Raving Looney" party to vote for.
That is being serious by the way.
Some of the candidates names are hilarious.

 

[L]

> I, vote Democrat! Mind your tongue, woman!

> No, usually there is some third party nominee or other that I find to be
> more ideologically congenial, or that I can at least vote for in better
> conscience.
> Not that they ever have a ghost of a chance...

didn't know the KKK were allowed to stand.

 

[Codreanu]

> didn't know the KKK were allowed to stand.

The fact that you conflate a warranted pessimism for the fate of multiculteral societies with the lumpen bigotry of Klan members shows that you are are only interested in misconstruing the issue at hand, caricturizing it as a manichaean struggle in the metaphysics of tolerance instead of the violation of civilizational virtue which it is. I can no more understand the racialist fetichisizion of race any more than I can the anti-racists who mine this issue for a cheap moral frisson. As a whole, mass third-world immigration has done little to improve the affected communities other than drive down wages for native employees, foment ethnic strife, overtax infrastructure, and empower a decadent educational-therapeutic bureaucracy to deal with the chaos thus produced --but I suppose that all of this is a small price to pay for the enrichment of a few capitalists and a faux sense of "rightousness" for ethically vacuous liberals.

 

[L]

> The fact that you conflate a warranted pessimism for the fate of
> multiculteral societies with the lumpen bigotry of Klan members shows that
> you are are only interested in misconstruing the issue at hand,
> caricturizing it as a manichaean struggle in the metaphysics of tolerance
> instead of the violation of civilizational virtue which it is. I can no
> more understand the racialist fetichisizion of race any more than I can
> the anti-racists who mine this issue for a cheap moral frisson. As a
> whole, mass third-world immigration has done little to improve the
> affected communities other than drive down wages for native employees,
> foment ethnic strife, overtax infrastructure, and empower a decadent
> educational-therapeutic bureaucracy to deal with the chaos thus produced
> --but I suppose that all of this is a small price to pay for the
> enrichment of a few capitalists and a faux sense of
> "rightousness" for ethically vacuous liberals.

blah blah blah ,impressive use of language apart from the fact that it's actually nothing but hot air ,as for what you call a faux sense of rightousness i can assure you that there's nothing false about my views and as i said before , calling me a liberal is an insult i'm no liberal and don't you mistake me for one.

 

[Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade]

>calling me a liberal is an insult i'm no liberal
> and don't you mistake me for one.

You're a communist?

 

[L]

> You're a communist?

if that's what you want to call it ,then yes i am.

 

[Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade]

> if that's what you want to call it ,then yes i am.

What do YOU want to call it?

 

[please]

> What do YOU want to call it?
isn't communism just centralised capatalism, the most hierachical form of society?

If you want to blame any thing for the state of the world blame neo-liberalism.

 

[Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade]

> isn't communism just centralised capatalism, the most hierachical form of
> society?

> If you want to blame any thing for the state of the world blame
> neo-liberalism.

Explain.

 

[please]

> Explain.

Do you want me to explain neo-liberalism or what it has done.

To sum up neo-liberalism spelt the death of the social in society (i am led to believe there was one but am too young to have ever experienced it).

Please let me know what you would like to know and i will be happy to deconstruct neo-liberalism