Tell me, isn't it only looking like an attempet of Morrissey's signature?
that's exactly what I'm trying to say.
Tell me, isn't it only looking like an attempet of Morrissey's signature?
I actually think this one coul be genuine?
I'm not so sure. He sells too many Morrissey's and I'm not sure about the M and the O. The seller is alright (sometimes) but I'm not convinced enough to buy one of his Morrissey's. I say this because when I picked my last one up I was looking at one or two that he had and decided against it. I wouldn't give it a definite thumbs down but I'm not certain enough.
When you're looking at what's real or not in an autograph you need to get various known authentic examples of that autograph and check for consistencies. For example, you'll find Morrissey has been signing the M and the o in his name consistently for the past four or five years. The R's have only recently persistently started sloping backwards and the rest of his autograph is too inconsistent to really use as a benchmark for authenticity. If he keeps signing as he has been recently everything'll be whole lot easier!
I think what you're doing is commendable but you need to be more scientific in your process
The one that ROKY posted that is signed in 2002 on the Best Of Morrissey LP is very very real.
I'm not so sure. He sells too many Morrissey's and I'm not sure about the M and the O. The seller is alright (sometimes) but I'm not convinced enough to buy one of his Morrissey's. I say this because when I picked my last one up I was looking at one or two that he had and decided against it. I wouldn't give it a definite thumbs down but I'm not certain enough.
When you're looking at what's real or not in an autograph you need to get various known authentic examples of that autograph and check for consistencies. For example, you'll find Morrissey has been signing the M and the o in his name consistently for the past four or five years. The R's have only recently persistently started sloping backwards and the rest of his autograph is too inconsistent to really use as a benchmark for authenticity. If he keeps signing as he has been recently everything'll be whole lot easier!
I think what you're doing is commendable but you need to be more scientific in your process
I think its fake on reflection but it looks more convincing than your ebay sig. Not having a go, just saying.
I wish I had infinite patience but I haven't.
I know my ebay sig is genuine, I know who collected it, when they collected it and having done more than a bit of research into Morrissey signatures I know more than just a little bit about what's genuine and what isn't. And mine is.
I've tried to contribute in a positive fashion on here by giving a bit of advice. Part of my advice is to not buy something if you don't like the look of it and that includes my item. But to persist with the claim that it isn't real is frankly ridiculous. It's fairly clear that the only autograph examples that you're willing to accept as genuine are those that have been collected in a very calm, controlled environment. Well anyone who collects autographs on mass knows that is no benchmark on how to measure whether something is authentic or not. That's why you have to take a lot of examples of an autograph, as many as possible but a minimum of three, and have them sat in front of you and to actually compare and contrast them for points that match in an autograph. You obviously aren't doing this and you're going on a hunch of what feels right - this is also part of what you should do but you're not doing the rest of it and then dispatching "advice" on a public forum which to my mind isn't really on. If you're going to do something then do it properly!
so you want us to imagine that morrissey "was running out of the hotel-x to his car with hoards of paparazzi around him" when he signed it?
perhaps thats the case with this one too:
http://cgi.ebay.com/SIGNED-vauxhall-and-I-CD-MORRISSEY-The-Smiths_W0QQitemZ280648373131
Nope. You can believe whatever you want
As for the link in your post, I'll take it that you're just being obnoxious for the sake of it.
That's the reason why the Morrissey in my autograph collection is from a controlled signing and this one's up for sale. Neither is more real than the other but I'm going with the signed poster for myself just out of personal preference as it's a better autograph.
i posted the link cos of the title of this thread.
neither is more real than the other?
Ok then, on every level I don't like that one, no.[/qoute]
reminds me of the beethoven one posted the other day.
Well, I have three Morrissey autographs, all look different but all are real. Your point is?
that maybe they are being discussed in the right place.
Ok then, on every level I don't like that one, no.[/qoute]
reminds me of the beethoven one posted the other day.
that maybe they are being discussed in the right place.
The point is that what reminds you of whatever else is neither here nor there and until you look at autographs with a certain procedure you'll make one mistake after another.
Not that I want to prolongue this any more
BUT
On what level does this
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/MORRISSEY-BEE...?pt=UK_CDsDVDs_CDs_CDs_GL&hash=item33628d51eb
resemble this?
http://cgi.ebay.com/SIGNED-vauxhall-and-I-CD-MORRISSEY-The-Smiths_W0QQitemZ280648373131
Both of them are farking FAKE!
Both of them are farking FAKE!