I can't say I'm thrilled with the title. His titles are usually quite unique. I here's to hoping for great songs.
deleted
'Beyond Ecstatic' would've been a better LP title.
WPINYB (first!) is a bit....meh.
Yes - it lacks the *zing* of YATQ and the deadpan of ROTT. Still, we'll get used to it.
I suppose it depends on how it is meant.
He is a public figure who uses his fame to promote his unusual (and somewhat recent) political beliefs, which appear at times to be best described as Anarcho-UKIP.
Hi Johnny, good to see your posts again.I suppose it depends on how it is meant.
As a statement of pure fact it is pretty accurate. If factions wish to kill each other in Bangui or Homs, I can't honestly say I care very much. Nor can I, or a million placard wielding do-gooders, do a damn thing about it.
As he likely means it, a Rustle Brained sixth-form political statement, it is a bit... well... rubbish. If he, like Brand, is serious in his sudden conversion to revolutionary politics (from his infinity pool overlooking Los Angeles) he can hardly continue this line of "I don't need to defend my own point of view." as he astonishingly claimed in his recent Q&A. Yes, he does. He absolutely does.
He is a public figure who uses his fame to promote his unusual (and somewhat recent) political beliefs, which appear at times to be best described as Anarcho-UKIP. Unless he is able to expound on those opinions in a lucid manner he'll fall into the same simple and embarrassingly obvious trap Brand did in his recent Paxman interview, and many will suspect that like Jeremy Clarkson, for example, he holds contrary and controversial viewpoints because it puts cash in his pocket.
When he keeps to his own little world and coterie of yes men and salt wranglers, then fine, but step out into the real world and he'll need some real answers. It is time he put himself up in front of an Andrew Neil or Jeremy Paxman, so we can see and hear the breadth of his conviction.
Bets can also start to be taken on whether the cover will feature an up to date photograph. He seems to have decided that ten year old shots do him more justice, and that the only time modern Morrissey will be seen is like the Phantom of the Opera before him, emerging briefly from the shadows, stage left.
My only real hope for the album is that it is Quarry style good, and that post-Savile he decides that this time around the cover will not feature him grabbing a baby by the balls.
So, looks like the US Tour will be featuring a least a handful of songs not yet known to the audience. Not that I necessarily mind this. Worth noting, though. In fact, I quite enjoyed hearing several Quarry songs live in LA and NY back in early 2004 prior to album release, in addition to the tracks previously debuted in 2002.
So is it "Morrissey, World Peace is None of Your Business" you think?
Hi Johnny, good to see your posts again.
I do, though sort of disagree with you.
I don't think it matters what he means.
Indeed, I'd prefer not to know what he means.
Which is kind of true of all his output, including the book.
I love the songs and the book.
They all (or atleast a lot) hit the senses in a good way.
But it's when he starts explaining what he thinks that the whole edifice collapes.
Who cares what he thinks.
I want to hear his music, that's what his success is built on, not his views on immigration or world peace.
'World Peace is none of your business' simply sounds good.
I like it. It's thought provoking.
I hope the songs don't suck.