I'll see your Wiki and raise you a biography by Robert Payne:
"Hitler's asceticism played an important part in the image he projected over Germany. According to the widely believed legend, he neither smoked nor drank, nor did he eat meat or have anything to do with women. Only the first was true. He drank beer and diluted wine frequently, had a special fondness for Bavarian sausages and kept a mistress, Eva Braun, who lived with him quietly in the Berghof. There had been other discreet affairs with women. His asceticism was fiction invented by Goebbels to emphasize his total dedication, his self-control, the distance that separated him from other men. By this outward show of asceticism, he could claim that he was dedicated to the service of his people."
"In fact, he was remarkably self-indulgent and possessed none of the instincts of the ascetic. His cook, an enormously fat man named Willy Kanneneberg, produced exquisite meals and acted as court jester. Although Hitler had no fondness for meat except in the form of sausages, and never ate fish, he enjoyed caviar. He was a connoisseur of sweets, crystallized fruit and cream cakes, which he consumed in astonishing quantities. He drank tea and coffee drowned in cream and sugar. No dictator ever had a sweeter tooth."
There's lots more here:
It would seem problematic, at best, to call Hitler a vegetarian
Hardly much of a raise. Robert Payne was a serial biographist, who published books about virtually every semi-important 20th century leader. More than 110 titles to his credit, including biographies of Charlie Chaplin, Greta Garbo, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Gandhi, Albert Schweitzer, Dostoyevsky, Ivan the Terrible, Chiang Kai-shek, Karl Marx, Mao Zedong, Sun Yat-sen, André Malraux, Shakespeare, Alexander the Great, The White Rajahs of Sarawak and George C. Marshall - with the level of expertise on each of them neccessarily correspondingly low. Not the best of sources. This hasn't exactly been a special interest of mine, but I have read widely on the subject of Nazi Germany, and certainly have not come away from that with anything like the picture Payne paints in the above. I'll try to have a look at what a more credible source (such as Kershaw) has to say on the issue.
Rynn Berry's article at the quoted link is in my frank opinion unimpressive to say the least, revolving as it does around the preposterous premise of whether Hitler's dietary practice really corresponded to the exacting standards of Berry's own definition of "true vegetarianism". So, he liked a bit of Leberknödel in his soup now and then. So, there was a bit of ham in his salad - perhaps we should bear in mind that this was central Europe in the 1930s. Around here, you STILL find ham included under the vegetarian section on restaurant menus here and there. Presumably on the logic that if it isn't a big chunk of beef or pig, it's not meat.
So what - call him a lapsed vegetarian or whatever, it hardly changes the basic fact that he adhered to a fundamentally vegetarian dietary regime.
The general asceticism of his lifestyle I've seen reference to in so many primary sources that I see no grounds for doubting it, and certainly not on the basis of Berry's hopelessly tendentious readings and rather strained logic. He's perfectly entitled to argue that Hitler didn't meet his own definition of vegetarian, but most people would find "vegetarian" a satisfactory description of someone who consistently adheres to a vegetable diet save for the occasional strip of ham or Leberknödel. And he goes
way overboard in implying that the man was probably in actuality a raving glutton, on the basis of a few weak snips. Besides the obvious fact that a (more or less) vegetarian Hitler doesn't fit comfortably into his own world-view. It all smacks of a desire to avoid facing the difficult and uncomfortable, which is never a pretty sight.
And seriously - dismissing his alleged sentimental fondness for animals on the basis of having fed Blondi Cyanide before committing suicide? On that logic he must also have been a self-loather. There is such a thing as realising the internal logic at play, even though that was a very twisted logic indeed.
Sorry mate, nothing of this is against you, but bad and tendentious history just really riles me.
cheers