Worm
Taste the diffidence
Bless you, Worm, for posting the actual bill. Since I don't have time to read the whole thing (I see that it is "streamlining" fair-housing laws, which does sound ominous), I'm going to take your word for it that it essentially privatizes public housing.
I'd have to listen to both sides of this argument before passing judgement, but if this is what it looks like, then it's certainly a step backwards from a more fair and just society.
The opposite argument seems to be that it gives tenants the right to organize into groups to better their housing situation and, potentially, the power to form co-ops that actually own the buildings in which they live. In addition to these points, there's the usual one: the market knows best, and private capital always runs things more efficiently than public institutions.
This argument is specious and we all know it. If you turn the poor over to private interests, there will be only two possible outcomes: neglect and/or exploitation.
To belabor the metaphor, we now have a choice between a messed-up boyfriend who will smack you around (but buy you flowers every once in a while, too), or a psycho who will brutally kill you outright.
You can try to reason with the first one; all you can do with the second one is say your prayers.
Jeez, can't a girl catch a break?
A girl can start by realizing that neither boyfriend can be reasoned with and neither boyfriend can be neutralized through prayer.
Last edited: