Subject: Who pulled the plug on me?
Date: 27/10/2008 09:40:04 GMT Standard Time
From: Morrisseythe23rd
To: Uncleskinny, vicarinatutugal, Sphinx, DavidT
and why exactly?
H
Date: 27/10/2008 17:44:46 GMT Standard Time
From: To: vicarinatutugal,
Hi there Hugh your infraction will expire in 3 days its a time out. I think you know what it was for so even writing this bothers me but anyway incase you forgot You posted a thread with a pic in it and were infracted against due to that.
You will have a PM in your in box explaining the infraction, which you can see when you get back on.
thats it as far as I can see it.
hope you are ok.
Karin
(are you coming on to Kate's site
http://thewrongarms.proboards.com/index.cgi?
Date: 27/10/2008 21:04:43 GMT Standard Time
From: Morrisseythe23rd
Thanks for taking the time to reply Karin. Either Peter's balls or his manners have shrivelled completely up David's arse, along with his sense of humour.
I'm pissed off. Hope you're well.
We both know why I was really sent to the naughty step. I remember all my posts clearly. None broke TOS but that isn't important in the So-low kangaroo court. Apparently there are three valid examples to be found in 'Off topic'. Can I see them and what TOS they broke? Tensions have escalated further and the current impasse looks less likely to ever be resolved. It's inevitable that I will respond to what I see as unjust and the Solo mods aren't really going to care that Hugh Clark is pissed off. I don't think David cares about anything at all.
My understanding now is only photographs glorifying nazi's can be posted on solo. We kind of knew that anyway going on history. It's kind of funny to be banned for posting a look-a-like of Masefield. What my dislike of steak pies has to do with Grim, I've no idea. Even the thread I started about the Moz wannabe was merged. I'm fine with that but look at the new threads posted today that should have been merged but weren't. We know the reason mine was and the others weren't.
The reason I've not popped into The wrong arms for a pint is, well, my desire to pour a pint of my own piss over Kewpie isn't going to weaken there. It's seems to be the bastard child from a one-night stand with solo. It would depend on how Kate runs her site, the people that serve it and the members that use it. I'd need to see a difference from So-low. I wish it lots of success. Also, I don't see why David, Peter and Kewpie's ignorance should exclude me from the Morrissey community. Which, effectively they have to a large extent and that wasn't the smart answer. That will only be effective against 'Morrissey the 23rd'. To paraphrase Lincoln, to sin by silence when I should protest would make me a coward. As Skywalker said to Vader, 'Never!'.
While writing this while in-between making and eating dinner, posts have obviously carried on and I need to respond to what I've read: There were no posts about Kewpie. In court, you'd have to present acceptable evidence. What you have is a belief. There is a massive difference. Doesn't calling Theo a wanker constitute harassment? I'm struggling to see that as anything other than directly insulting another user. Well, it is in my book and it is out-of-order. The different rules for different people will continue to cause friction on So-low. It is even kind of fascist eh? Your action has also seriously damaged our friendship Peter.
I must say Karin. That is a mighty big statement for you to decide what is funny and what isn't. My thoughts previously:
http://forums.morrissey-solo.com/showpost.php?p=912429&postcount=82
It is good to see Kewpie finally making an effort to explain.
Love, peace and harmony? Aye right!