It’s not about politics

These types of statistics are always bullshit but especially when they come from a biased source. I do think lots of people are sick of hearing about Black Lives Matter so much. I mean I originally felt it was something people needed to hear but after a while the repetition gets to be annoying.
As for George Floyd specifically, I'd really need to see how that poll was conducted and what the exact wording is of the questions people were asked. At the same time if "only" 28% of "whites" believe that the police were caught on camera murdering someone that seems pretty significant doesn't it?
That leaves 72% who have various other views and there are a number of options between believing the actions of the police were completely justified and that the police committed murder.
So your own bullshit numbers are really not helping your cause.
 
Does he know Louis will quietly expose the grift?
What is his grift? Obviously you’ve studied Nick in great detail to be able to make this assertion.
 
These types of statistics are always bullshit but especially when they come from a biased source. I do think lots of people are sick of hearing about Black Lives Matter so much. I mean I originally felt it was something people needed to hear but after a while the repetition gets to be annoying.
As for George Floyd specifically, I'd really need to see how that poll was conducted and what the exact wording is of the questions people were asked. At the same time if "only" 28% of "whites" believe that the police were caught on camera murdering someone that seems pretty significant doesn't it?
That leaves 72% who have various other views and there are a number of options between believing the actions of the police were completely justified and that the police committed murder.
So your own bullshit numbers are really not helping your cause.
"Police were caught on camera murdering someone "?Please correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the autopsy find he died as a result of the drugs in his system?Again if I'm mistaken please correct me.
 
"Police were caught on camera murdering someone "?Please correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the autopsy find he died as a result of the drugs in his system?Again if I'm mistaken please correct me.
You are actually a little mistaken as well. It wasn’t drugs in his system, it was a MASSIVE amount of drugs in his system.
 
You are actually a little mistaken as well. It wasn’t drugs in his system, it was a MASSIVE amount of drugs in his system.
I see. So he died of a drug overdose and the fact that the police murdered him is just an inconvenient footnote to that. At least have the balls to reply directly instead of making these comments hiding behind some anonymous post I wouldn't have even seen.
 
I see. So he died of a drug overdose and the fact that the police murdered him is just an inconvenient footnote to that. At least have the balls to reply directly instead of making these comments hiding behind some anonymous post I wouldn't have even seen.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: Like I give 2 shits about what you think.
 
What is his grift? Obviously you’ve studied Nick in great detail to be able to make this assertion.

All the political pundits on social media are grifters, making money out of selling their audience lies, drama & memes.
 
All the political pundits on social media are grifters, making money out of selling their audience lies, drama & memes.
TBH I tend to view a grifter as someone who is selling an idea they don’t genuinely believe in. For better or worse I think Fuentes is completely invested in his message. Same as say Jimmy Dore on the Left.
 
I see. So he died of a drug overdose and the fact that the police murdered him is just an inconvenient footnote to that. At least have the balls to reply directly instead of making these comments hiding behind some anonymous post I wouldn't have even seen.
Again I may be ignorant but if the armed police had shot and killed the man after he ignored their orders would they be within their "rights"?
 
TBH I tend to view a grifter as someone who is selling an idea they don’t genuinely believe in. For better or worse I think Fuentes is completely invested in his message. Same as say Jimmy Dore on the Left.

There's a tendency towards caring more about the metrics of their platform than the irl politics or people.

All across the political spectrum.
 
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: Like I give 2 shits about what you think.

Screen Shot 2021-03-08 at 12.13.54 PM.png
 
Guess who just made The Daily Beast today? Go on. Guess.

If you guessed yours truly, then you are 100% correct.

OK, more like 50% correct. They don't mention me by name but they quote and link to an article I wrote for Counter-Currents.


I have said that once the far-right has been wiped off the internet that class reductionist Marxists would be next. I was wondering how they were going to do it or what their angle would be. It appears that they are running with a combination of "Marxism is a gateway to fascism" mixed with "fascists like some of these guys so therefor they must be bad".
 
I like people posting non-fascist things.

How about people posting dancing gifs of politicians who a few months later approve drone strikes that kill 22 people? What are your thoughts about that? I'm sure you're not lost for words as you've subjected us to your thoughts nearly 10,000 times (20 times per day) on all manner of dilettantish 'twee' speciousness over the past 18 months. We even got a couple of dozen posts from you about Jody or whatever her name was, a yoga teacher who called into a radio show who for the flimsiest of reasons you thought might be reelfountain. And yet we can't extract one word from you about the militaristic politicians whose electoral victory you were celebrating only four months ago (the same goes for Radis "I once stood next to David Sylvian" Noir who responded to my post on this subject the other day with 200 words entirely unrelated to what I had written --- then he accuses others of whataboutery).

When there's something of actual relevance to contribute, to clarify and expand upon something that people might actually be interested in for once, you blend into the background and can't be reached for comment. You don't get to distract from your own pathetic conduct by referring continuously to "fascists". That's a cop out. Imagine if you guys spent as much time working on your own unpleasant traits and personality deficiencies as you do in opposing 'fascists' online (this includes that hyper-aggressive one dimensional pseud Verso) the world could be your oyster :lbf::lbf:
Okay, maybe that's expecting too much from you lot, you've already shown us all that you're capable of and this is about as good as it gets. Enjoy treating everyone to another combined 15,000 posts on this website over the next 12 months or so; world beating stuff. You have fascism on the ropes, forcing it to absorb stiff body blows. I can't wait for the next cliffsnotes explanation of the works of Heidegger; I expect we'll get that long before we get any introspection from nerak or Radis regarding their Biden/Harris fangirling.


Screenshot_20210109-153626.png
 
Last edited:
When there's something of actual relevance to contribute, to clarify and expand upon something that people might actually be interested in for once, you blend into the background and can't be reached for comment. You don't get to distract from your own pathetic conduct by referring continuously to "fascists".

To be fair, I am a fascist.

The problem with Nerak calling people fascists is that a) she doesn't understand what fascism is (most people don't) and b) she thinks that calling something "fascist" is an argument.

The funny thing about Nerak is that she claims to be a anti-establishment Marxist socialist. But she is so obsessed with owning the right-wingers that she will frequently make pro-establishment and pro-corporation arguments to try to do so.

Take this:

All the political pundits on social media are grifters, making money out of selling their audience lies, drama & memes.

Like what is the implication of this post?
So she doesn't what you getting your news and commentary from internet personalities. OK, then where? Well, the only alternative is to get it from corporate-owned sources. She is literally arguing FOR the corporations and AGAINST citizen journalists.
 
I used to think Sleepy Joe would hand over the reins to Kneepads Harris somewhere around the two year mark of his Presidency. Now I'm not sure he lasts the year:

 
Back
Top Bottom