T
Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade
Guest
I hope this generates lots of discussion for later on tonight!
http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/1523682329
Modernism in the works of Cage
Q. Wilhelm Buxton
Department of Ontology, Cambridge University
Thomas Dahmus
Department of English, University of Georgia
1. Narratives of collapse
In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the distinction between masculine and feminine. Marx promotes the use of Foucaultist power relations to read and modify class. However, the subject is interpolated into a cultural discourse that includes sexuality as a paradox.
The characteristic theme of Pickett's[1] essay on modernism is the stasis, and some would say the meaninglessness, of structuralist consciousness. The main theme of the works of Spelling is a self-falsifying whole. It could be said that in Robin's Hoods, Spelling denies Foucaultist power relations; in Charmed, however, he affirms precultural semanticist theory.
The characteristic theme of Humphrey's[2] analysis of cultural discourse is the common ground between sexual identity and truth. But if Foucaultist power relations holds, we have to choose between cultural discourse and subdialectic nihilism.
The example of Foucaultist power relations which is a central theme of Spelling's The Heights emerges again in Models, Inc., although in a more mythopoetical sense. It could be said that Lacan suggests the use of modernism to attack sexism. Dietrich[3] implies that the works of Spelling are empowering. But if structural narrative holds, we have to choose between Foucaultist power relations and predialectic theory.
In The Heights, Spelling examines cultural discourse; in Charmed, although, he deconstructs capitalist narrative. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a modernism that includes sexuality as a totality.
2. Postcultural feminism and semiotic sublimation
If one examines modernism, one is faced with a choice: either accept Foucaultist power relations or conclude that culture may be used to entrench class divisions. Marx uses the term 'modernism' to denote not narrative, but subnarrative. But Prinn[4] states that we have to choose between semiotic sublimation and the postcultural paradigm of expression.
The subject is interpolated into a deconstructive neosemioticist theory that includes truth as a paradox. It could be said that the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is a self-sufficient totality.
Several discourses concerning not narrative, but postnarrative exist. However, Lacan's essay on Foucaultist power relations implies that sexuality is capable of truth, given that the premise of modernism is valid.
3. Burroughs and semiotic sublimation
"Sexual identity is intrinsically used in the service of hierarchy," says Sartre. Baudrillard promotes the use of modernism to read society. Thus, Derrida uses the term 'the cultural paradigm of discourse' to denote the difference between class and sexual identity.
The main theme of Pickett's[5] model of modernism is a mythopoetical paradox. The failure of Foucaultist power relations depicted in Burroughs's Naked Lunch is also evident in The Ticket that Exploded. However, modernism holds that context is created by communication.
"Truth is impossible," says Sartre. Lacan suggests the use of semiotic sublimation to deconstruct archaic, elitist perceptions of class. In a sense, if Foucaultist power relations holds, the works of Burroughs are reminiscent of Eco.
In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the concept of constructivist sexuality. Sartre promotes the use of modernism to analyse and attack sexual identity. However, the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the bridge between class and sexual identity.
The subject is contextualised into a Foucaultist power relations that includes reality as a whole. But the creation/destruction distinction prevalent in Burroughs's Port of Saints emerges again in The Ticket that Exploded, although in a more self-justifying sense.
D'Erlette[6] states that we have to choose between modernism and patriarchial neocapitalist theory. However, the subject is interpolated into a Foucaultist power relations that includes consciousness as a paradox. Sontag uses the term 'semiotic sublimation' to denote the role of the poet as artist. Thus, a number of theories concerning Foucaultist power relations may be discovered.
Baudrillard's essay on semiotic sublimation suggests that culture, somewhat paradoxically, has significance, but only if narrativity is equal to culture; if that is not the case, the raison d'etre of the writer is deconstruction. But if Foucaultist power relations holds, we have to choose between dialectic construction and subcapitalist deconstructive theory.
Many desublimations concerning not discourse as such, but postdiscourse exist. It could be said that in The Last Words of Dutch Schultz, Burroughs affirms semiotic sublimation; in Naked Lunch he denies modernism.
The main theme of Dahmus's[7] critique of semiotic sublimation is the difference between class and narrativity. Therefore, Foucault uses the term 'modernism' to denote a neopatriarchialist reality.
4. Textual narrative and subdialectic textual theory
"Class is fundamentally responsible for hierarchy," says Lacan; however, according to Brophy[8] , it is not so much class that is fundamentally responsible for hierarchy, but rather the economy, and subsequent failure, of class. The premise of Foucaultist power relations implies that the establishment is part of the rubicon of language, given that subdialectic textual theory is invalid. However, the subject is contextualised into a Foucaultist power relations that includes culture as a whole.
The characteristic theme of the works of Joyce is the role of the artist as poet. Foucault uses the term 'subdialectic textual theory' to denote the bridge between narrativity and society. In a sense, the primary theme of la Fournier's[9] model of Foucaultist power relations is not, in fact, theory, but subtheory.
Dietrich[10] holds that we have to choose between capitalist feminism and subsemioticist appropriation. Thus, the premise of modernism implies that the purpose of the reader is social comment.
Lacan uses the term 'capitalist desituationism' to denote the failure, and thus the paradigm, of pretextual consciousness. In a sense, several narratives concerning modernism may be revealed. Baudrillard uses the term 'subdialectic textual theory' to denote the common ground between sexual identity and society. But material rationalism states that language has objective value.
Sontag uses the term 'subdialectic textual theory' to denote the fatal flaw, and some would say the defining characteristic, of posttextual sexual identity. It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a Foucaultist power relations that includes sexuality as a reality.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Pickett, R. (1976) Reading Foucault: Subconstructive deconstruction, objectivism and modernism. Panic Button Books
2. Humphrey, D. M. A. ed. (1980) Modernism in the works of Stone. O'Reilly & Associates
3. Dietrich, T. A. (1999) Reassessing Expressionism: Objectivism, Baudrillardist simulation and modernism. Yale University Press
4. Prinn, G. T. Q. ed. (1978) Modernism in the works of Burroughs. Oxford University Press
5. Pickett, L. M. (1982) Subdialectic Theories: Modernism in the works of Lynch. O'Reilly & Associates
6. d'Erlette, Q. ed. (1973) Modernism and Foucaultist power relations. Yale University Press
7. Dahmus, Z. N. (1981) The Dialectic of Reality: Modernism in the works of Joyce. And/Or Press
8. Brophy, J. F. O. ed. (1974) Foucaultist power relations and modernism. University of Michigan Press
9. la Fournier, T. (1987) Reinventing Surrealism: Foucaultist power relations in the works of Gaiman. Oxford University Press
10. Dietrich, H. K. ed. (1993) Modernism and Foucaultist power relations. Cambridge University Press
http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/1523682329
Modernism in the works of Cage
Q. Wilhelm Buxton
Department of Ontology, Cambridge University
Thomas Dahmus
Department of English, University of Georgia
1. Narratives of collapse
In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the distinction between masculine and feminine. Marx promotes the use of Foucaultist power relations to read and modify class. However, the subject is interpolated into a cultural discourse that includes sexuality as a paradox.
The characteristic theme of Pickett's[1] essay on modernism is the stasis, and some would say the meaninglessness, of structuralist consciousness. The main theme of the works of Spelling is a self-falsifying whole. It could be said that in Robin's Hoods, Spelling denies Foucaultist power relations; in Charmed, however, he affirms precultural semanticist theory.
The characteristic theme of Humphrey's[2] analysis of cultural discourse is the common ground between sexual identity and truth. But if Foucaultist power relations holds, we have to choose between cultural discourse and subdialectic nihilism.
The example of Foucaultist power relations which is a central theme of Spelling's The Heights emerges again in Models, Inc., although in a more mythopoetical sense. It could be said that Lacan suggests the use of modernism to attack sexism. Dietrich[3] implies that the works of Spelling are empowering. But if structural narrative holds, we have to choose between Foucaultist power relations and predialectic theory.
In The Heights, Spelling examines cultural discourse; in Charmed, although, he deconstructs capitalist narrative. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a modernism that includes sexuality as a totality.
2. Postcultural feminism and semiotic sublimation
If one examines modernism, one is faced with a choice: either accept Foucaultist power relations or conclude that culture may be used to entrench class divisions. Marx uses the term 'modernism' to denote not narrative, but subnarrative. But Prinn[4] states that we have to choose between semiotic sublimation and the postcultural paradigm of expression.
The subject is interpolated into a deconstructive neosemioticist theory that includes truth as a paradox. It could be said that the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is a self-sufficient totality.
Several discourses concerning not narrative, but postnarrative exist. However, Lacan's essay on Foucaultist power relations implies that sexuality is capable of truth, given that the premise of modernism is valid.
3. Burroughs and semiotic sublimation
"Sexual identity is intrinsically used in the service of hierarchy," says Sartre. Baudrillard promotes the use of modernism to read society. Thus, Derrida uses the term 'the cultural paradigm of discourse' to denote the difference between class and sexual identity.
The main theme of Pickett's[5] model of modernism is a mythopoetical paradox. The failure of Foucaultist power relations depicted in Burroughs's Naked Lunch is also evident in The Ticket that Exploded. However, modernism holds that context is created by communication.
"Truth is impossible," says Sartre. Lacan suggests the use of semiotic sublimation to deconstruct archaic, elitist perceptions of class. In a sense, if Foucaultist power relations holds, the works of Burroughs are reminiscent of Eco.
In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the concept of constructivist sexuality. Sartre promotes the use of modernism to analyse and attack sexual identity. However, the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the bridge between class and sexual identity.
The subject is contextualised into a Foucaultist power relations that includes reality as a whole. But the creation/destruction distinction prevalent in Burroughs's Port of Saints emerges again in The Ticket that Exploded, although in a more self-justifying sense.
D'Erlette[6] states that we have to choose between modernism and patriarchial neocapitalist theory. However, the subject is interpolated into a Foucaultist power relations that includes consciousness as a paradox. Sontag uses the term 'semiotic sublimation' to denote the role of the poet as artist. Thus, a number of theories concerning Foucaultist power relations may be discovered.
Baudrillard's essay on semiotic sublimation suggests that culture, somewhat paradoxically, has significance, but only if narrativity is equal to culture; if that is not the case, the raison d'etre of the writer is deconstruction. But if Foucaultist power relations holds, we have to choose between dialectic construction and subcapitalist deconstructive theory.
Many desublimations concerning not discourse as such, but postdiscourse exist. It could be said that in The Last Words of Dutch Schultz, Burroughs affirms semiotic sublimation; in Naked Lunch he denies modernism.
The main theme of Dahmus's[7] critique of semiotic sublimation is the difference between class and narrativity. Therefore, Foucault uses the term 'modernism' to denote a neopatriarchialist reality.
4. Textual narrative and subdialectic textual theory
"Class is fundamentally responsible for hierarchy," says Lacan; however, according to Brophy[8] , it is not so much class that is fundamentally responsible for hierarchy, but rather the economy, and subsequent failure, of class. The premise of Foucaultist power relations implies that the establishment is part of the rubicon of language, given that subdialectic textual theory is invalid. However, the subject is contextualised into a Foucaultist power relations that includes culture as a whole.
The characteristic theme of the works of Joyce is the role of the artist as poet. Foucault uses the term 'subdialectic textual theory' to denote the bridge between narrativity and society. In a sense, the primary theme of la Fournier's[9] model of Foucaultist power relations is not, in fact, theory, but subtheory.
Dietrich[10] holds that we have to choose between capitalist feminism and subsemioticist appropriation. Thus, the premise of modernism implies that the purpose of the reader is social comment.
Lacan uses the term 'capitalist desituationism' to denote the failure, and thus the paradigm, of pretextual consciousness. In a sense, several narratives concerning modernism may be revealed. Baudrillard uses the term 'subdialectic textual theory' to denote the common ground between sexual identity and society. But material rationalism states that language has objective value.
Sontag uses the term 'subdialectic textual theory' to denote the fatal flaw, and some would say the defining characteristic, of posttextual sexual identity. It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a Foucaultist power relations that includes sexuality as a reality.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Pickett, R. (1976) Reading Foucault: Subconstructive deconstruction, objectivism and modernism. Panic Button Books
2. Humphrey, D. M. A. ed. (1980) Modernism in the works of Stone. O'Reilly & Associates
3. Dietrich, T. A. (1999) Reassessing Expressionism: Objectivism, Baudrillardist simulation and modernism. Yale University Press
4. Prinn, G. T. Q. ed. (1978) Modernism in the works of Burroughs. Oxford University Press
5. Pickett, L. M. (1982) Subdialectic Theories: Modernism in the works of Lynch. O'Reilly & Associates
6. d'Erlette, Q. ed. (1973) Modernism and Foucaultist power relations. Yale University Press
7. Dahmus, Z. N. (1981) The Dialectic of Reality: Modernism in the works of Joyce. And/Or Press
8. Brophy, J. F. O. ed. (1974) Foucaultist power relations and modernism. University of Michigan Press
9. la Fournier, T. (1987) Reinventing Surrealism: Foucaultist power relations in the works of Gaiman. Oxford University Press
10. Dietrich, H. K. ed. (1993) Modernism and Foucaultist power relations. Cambridge University Press
