Answer to Oaf: Islam is a diverse world, not a one-dimensional "evil empire".

  • Thread starter Robert Evans - The Comeback Kid
  • Start date
R

Robert Evans - The Comeback Kid

Guest
> If we're talking about spreading the disease of hate, I think one has to
> address the fact that the Koran, Islamic law, all Muslim governments (as
> well as their state-run media), many if not most Muslim mosques, and many
> if not most Muslim schools take people from the day they're born and
> brainwash them with pure hatred. Hatred for women, hatred for gays, hatred
> for "infidels." And teach them that "peace" equals
> full submission of all people to Allah, and that the end of history will
> be when the entire world is Muslim.

Are Christianity and Judaism any better then Islam in aspect of tolerance of gays? In practice, yes. Gays and lesbians in Christian world and in Israel are protected by civilian society, in spite of church (and Jewish Orthodox rabbies) homophobia. And Jewish and Christian religious institution's homophobia is not even closely as violent as Islamic homophobia.

In theory, on paper, Islam is not really worse then fairy tales of ours. Old Testament (common for Jews and Christians) condemns homosexuality by death, as a part of Ten Commendments. So, if one desires, everybody could find pieces of text in both Holy Quaran and Old/New Testaments which are... homophobic, anti-women, obscurantist etc... Doctor Laura in her chauvinist Yankee Doodle ignorance started quoting Quaran once as an example of "evil" book on her "show". Her Arab-American opponent smartly quoted back to her parts of New Testament which were at least as "evil" and "intolerant to other religions" as her piecemeal "Beverly Hills madam"-interpreted Quaran.

So, the question is, how seriously your average Muslim takes his/her Islam? Answer: very seriously indeed.... At least at Arab world. Your Acme Christian? Jew? Both Christians and Jews used to be overwhelmingly religious/observant/fanatical only three hundreds years ago... LUCKILY< NOT ANY MORE! About 50% of American Jews are marrying a Christian spouse nowadays... Praise the Lord! :) About well over 90% of our Judeo-Christian civilization are taking religion... lightly. As a social thing, as an Sunday manifestation of ethnic pride (Polish, Italian, Ukrainian) in the eyes of their WASP neighbours, as a nice habit, which is supposed to be respected for the sake of the grandma... but not too seriously or too deeply. Even many deeply religious Christians and Jews are under influence of ideas of Enlightment (which is a good thing, of course) and are reinterpreting say, New Testament obviously anti-Semitic passages (Paul Testaments) and anti-women/unabashedly sexist passages (all over the Bible) as something totally opposite to what it was originally intended to be, which is again, perhaps a positive development. Better to misinterpret New Testament, then to burn and slay Jews and Arabs during their Crusades, as Medieval Europeans did in their Christian fanaticism trip during Dark Ages.

> I have no problem with an individual Muslim who isn't into Hitlerian
> racism, gender apartheid, opression of homosexuals, outlawing of
> "decadent" culture and pleasures, doesn't believe that
> democracy, science, and freedom are abohorant, or isn't sympathetic to
> terror-loving freaks who blow up pizza parlors full of teenagers. I have
> no problem with any Muslim who isn't what I call one of the Muslim
> freakazoids. But the Muslim freakazoids - or perhaps better put, the
> Muslim fascists - are great in number and not being met with much
> condemnation from the peace-loving, moderate Muslims who you claim are the
> majority.

Well, what about certain American lawyer from Cleveland, Ohio anti-Islamic bias? :) What about pizza parlors of West Bank and Gaza full of Palestinian teenagers relaxing and then... Israeli [American taxpayers-financed] planes suddenly coming out of the blue to bomb those Palestinian citizens as a retaliation for similar atavistically cruel acts of Palestinian terror? "Muslim freakazoids" is a cool catchphrase, obviously, but Israeli-Palestinian conflict is political in its core, not religious! Therefore, solution must be political to save lifes of Israeli and Palestinian pizza-eaters and... OK, I promised not to touch politics so here I would stop! We are discussing religions there, right?

Also, there are half billion Muslims around the world... and believe me, a small minority are radical. There are Muslim countries like Turkey (free westernized country), Malaysia (big way!), Indonesia (in spite of recent Bali act), Iran (relatively free elections, progressive president), Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan (pro-Western pro-Russian dictators, Russian sphere of influence) etc... where there are some significant achievements in science and infrastructure and inroads of democracy and industrial development recently took place. On the other hand, there are countries like Iraq and Saudi Arabia which are regressed in their societal development. And there are desperately poor and overpopulated countries like Pakistan which became the hotbeds to Islamic militancy. So, dear Oaf, all Islamic believers are very different and diverse from each other, with different languages, cultures, level of development and different degree of westernization et cetera, et cetera... By labeling all those diverse peoples and governments "islamic freakazoids", you just show your ignorance and utter lack of true info about Islam and Islamic peoples...

> In recent decades Islamic culture may have grown dangerously sick. I don't
> see why this is some horrible thing to speculate about. We've seen
> cultures become sick before. Nazi German culture in the 1930s was rather
> ill, no? So was Japanese culture in the same time period.

Oaf, did you take your body temperature lately? Winters in Cleveland are cold... :)

> I happened to be one who fully supported the rescue of Muslims from
> Milosevic's genocide. I also happened to be one who fully supported the
> toppling of the Taliban, so that maybe a new government could be built in
> Afghanistan where ALL types of Muslims can be free to practice the Islam
> THEY want to, and where people of other faiths or no faith can practice
> their personal beliefs as well.

Milocevic's genocide? Hmm, what about Bosnians and Croats genocide against ethnic Greek-Orthodox (Pravoslavnyx) Serbs? Again, Oaf, showing your Republican Party line... :)

> It could be that I'm fully aware of the efforts of these millions upon
> millions of moderate, peace-loving Muslims, who seek democracy, separation
> of church and state, the end of gender aprtheid, the right of homosexuals
> to live freely, and the right of "infidels" to put their
> children on a bus and not have them blown up. I know that such Muslims
> exist and in large numbers. What I don't know is what percentage of Islam
> they make up and how much they really care about their religion being
> currently dominated by fascists, and I don't think this is my fault.
> Opinion polls in some Muslim majority countries are rather frightening.
> For example, I read that 76% of Kuwaitis admire Usama bin Laden. But when
> I meet somebody I make it a point to meet them with a clean slate and
> judge them as an individual. Every person I meet, I tell myself, don't
> make any assumptions about this person. However, I do reserve the right to
> think critically about belief systems. I have no obligation to give
> automatic respect to a belief system. And most certainly not to a
> religion, as religions are a bunch of poppycock made up off the top of
> people's heads. No, no religion will ever get respect from me. Tolerance
> of those who practice them, yes, but not because they practice that
> religion. That respect would be because who of who they are as inviduals
> as a whole, separate and apart from what religion they happen to dig. And
> tolerance does not mean I have to like Islam any more than I'd have to
> like Nazism or communism. I'm quite sure the world would be better off
> with no religion, most especially with no Islam, but that's not for me to
> dictate, only to hope for.

Hmm, I heard huge majority of Kuwaitis and Egyptians love America and things American... Perhaps, social statistics is a very inprecise science.... If researcher is anti-Arab, he & she would always deliberately find an vehemently anti-American sample of populace for observation. At least, by my private experience, Arabs & Muslims are as human as Jews and Blacks and Whites... Also, depends how question was precisely asked: if an Acme political pollster would ask an average Egyptian: "Do you agree with Saddam Hussein that Bush Administration is anti-Arab biased and Israel could perpetrate her anti-Palestinian atrocities only because American support?", I'm sure around 90% of Muslims would say "YES", but it does not mean they support Saddam at any degree.

Oaf, be honest with yourself, you don't know a shit about Islam, you are just trying to show up your vaguely Zionist sympathies...

> The first time I remember thinking about Islam was when I heard that some
> kooks in Iran issued a death sentence on Salman Rushdie for writing a
> book. Since then I've seen ever-escalating atrocities, intolerance, and
> fascism rising in Islamic culture. The kind of thing people say they're
> afraid of in America if a Jerry Falwell ever because President. Well,
> Jerry Falwell isn't going to be president, but Islamic versions of him,
> and even far worse, have taken over the Islamic world.

I heard Iranian clergy took this particular "fatwah" (death sentence) back under pressure from Iranian secularists...

> Sadly, what I've NOT seen much of are Muslim-led demonstrations and
> marches condemning the murders of thousands and thousands of innocent
> people by extremist Muslims world-wide in the past couple decades. I know
> they have the ability to speak out, as they've spoken quite a bit about
> their concerns of real or (more often) imagined opressions of Muslims in
> the United States and other western countries since 9/11. They've even
> convinced YOU that we're supposedly torturing the terrorist soldiers we
> captured and placed in Guatanamo Bay before they could unleash
> unprecedented mass-murders, while at the same time we have to pull their
> teeth to get unambiguous condemnations of people who purposely target,
> say, a bus full of jewish kids. Is it too much to ask that they condemn
> terror-loving barbarian savages with equal vigor as they attack the
> alleged conditions at Guantanomo Bay? Or, say, the supposed unfairness of
> portraying a terrorist as a Muslim in a Hollywood film (as if that's so
> far-fetched!)? I never have trouble finding outraged Muslims in the media
> when a movie opens that happens to have a Muslim terrorist character. But
> when three doctors were murdered in Yemen recently, I didn't see much
> concern over their religion being hijacked by extremists.

As somebody working with movie industry as an computer Cad & PhotoShop specialist, I would say Muslim representation in Hollywood is around zero (Omar Sheriff :) ), while big guys in Hollywood are nowadays (and always were) ... peoples with Eastern European-sounding names like Warner brothers, Zanuck, Katzenberg, Geffen, Spielberg.... No wonder, there are movies so primitively anti-Muslim biased like 'Father of the Bride', not to mention anti-Arab "golden oldies" like "Cannonball 2"... While Israelis are shown in "heroic" movies like 'Exsodus' with Paul Newman and 'Operation Entebbe'... I'm not saying that Hollywood doesn't have it's share of glory days and great Jewish-American actors & producers, I'm saying, that too many of them automatically took Israeli side of the story, hook and swallow...

> All I've seen are individual Muslims here and there, no organized effort
> to make sure mainstream Islam isn't confused with fascist Islam. And now
> we have a situation where extremist Muslims are threatening to murder
> MILLIONS of innocent people worldwide, from India to Australia to the USA
> to Africa to Indonesia. And still, the moderate Muslim world is strangely
> silent. Where was the Muslim protest of the Nigerian riot? I saw that news
> report and it boggled my mind that in 2002 people could actually murder
> innocent people over a beauty pageant! I read articles from Muslims who
> condemned the journalist who supposedly "provoked" this riot,
> when all she really did was excersize her free speech (repsecting free
> speech is not something the Koran teaches...). This is but one example,
> and at some point one has to have the guts to say: Maybe it's time Muslims
> - in between telling America how America must examine itself - should
> start examining the state of their culture and their belief system.

Of course there are progressive Muslims out there... The problem is, American media is silent about them... For example, Lebanese public opinion condemned the planning of conference of Holocaust deniers in Beirut... After many Arab public figures petitioned Lebanese government, permission for conference was withdrawn...

> Now, I happen to think Christianity is pretty nutso too and has caused
> lots of horrors in this world. No one ever calls me or anyone else
> "intolerant" or "hateful" for saying this on this
> board. You see that in this thread. People are open to examining
> Christianity, but somehow Islam is something no one's allowed to say a bad
> word about. Well, you claim that in 2003 Islam is a "fundemantlly a
> better religion" than Christianity. Yet IMO, if there were weekly
> atrocities committed by a significant number of Christians worldwide over
> recent years and to the present, with the support of Christian
> governments, many Christian religious leaders, numerous Christian
> organizations (and even charities!), and bred by many Christian schools,
> that this would be met by marches, demonstrations, and protests to make
> clear that these wackjobs in no way represent mainstream Christianity. But
> then again, I guess I can't prove it, because thousands and thousands of
> innocent people are not currently being murdered, and millions more not
> currently being targeted for death, by a worldwide network of Christian
> terrorist cells.

> Christianity has had dark periods just like Islam. The differnce, IMO, is
> that Christianity has managed to somewhat reform itself to fit in with the
> modern world, even though it's still and forever a dark aged belief system
> better left behind. Western civilization had a renassaince and so forth.
> Furthemore, it's a fortunate thing that the majority of people claiming to
> be Christian in western first world democracies tend to say they're
> Chrsitian just to fit in, and don't actually believe the rubbish at their
> core. Islam, OTOH, has yet to adapt to the modern world, and thus, with
> globalization, we're witnessing a clash between Islamic dark aged culture
> and modern civilization. I have full confidence that civilization will
> prevail over barbarian religious fanatics, but my concern is that too many
> people will die before Islam accepts its need to reform and reinvent
> itself. And this is only made worse by the fact that moderate Muslims are
> oddly far too silent, and many of them are possibly a tad sympathetic.

> Anyway, I will never surrendor my right to free thought and free speech,
> and when someone tells me that Islam is not fair game for examination and
> criticism, that feels like thought-policing political correctness to me.
> Islam is not a race. I didn't realize that if you have a belief or
> philosphy that happens to also be a religion that it deserves automatic
> respect and deference. But then I didn't take religon courses in college,
> as I feel the entire religion departments of all universities are mostly a
> waste of time. The fact that millions and millions of people happen to be
> Muslim also doesn't impress me. But obviously when I speak of savage,
> terror-loving barbarians from Hell plaguing the earth at this time, I'm
> speaking of people who have joined the ranks of, or are sympathetic to,
> fascist organizations such as al Quaeda, and they have indeed plagued the
> earth for several decades now. That you thought I was speaking of every
> individual Muslim only further illuminates the crisis in that culture, and
> the need for sane, non-brainwashed Muslims to stand up and be counted.

OK. Some of Oaf words are true... Yet, both me and him ought to know about Islam much more before judging it.... We, Americans are so self-centered, we are easily tempted to stereotype all Islamic world like a den of "freakazoids" and sinister murderers. Luckily for all of us, the reality is much brighter, and many in the Islamic world, especially among college-educated peoples are pro-western and pro-american.... To put all Islamic peoples in the roster of "our enemies", as Oaf is doing now... is to make the best birthday gift for Bin Laden and his clan of real anti-American and anti-humanity murderers and terrorists... In opposite, we must to seek friends among Islamic world, only this way the victory at War against radical Islamic terror could be achieved!
 
> Are Christianity and Judaism any better then Islam in aspect of tolerance
> of gays? In practice, yes. Gays and lesbians in Christian world and in
> Israel are protected by civilian society, in spite of church (and Jewish
> Orthodox rabbies) homophobia. And Jewish and Christian religious
> institution's homophobia is not even closely as violent as Islamic
> homophobia.

> In theory, on paper, Islam is not really worse then fairy tales of ours.
> Old Testament (common for Jews and Christians) condemns homosexuality by
> death, as a part of Ten Commendments. So, if one desires, everybody could
> find pieces of text in both Holy Quaran and Old/New Testaments which
> are... homophobic, anti-women, obscurantist etc... Doctor Laura in her
> chauvinist Yankee Doodle ignorance started quoting Quaran once as an
> example of "evil" book on her "show". Her
> Arab-American opponent smartly quoted back to her parts of New Testament
> which were at least as "evil" and "intolerant to other
> religions" as her piecemeal "Beverly Hills
> madam"-interpreted Quaran.

Yes, I understand that nobody can really DEFEND the Koran, which contains some pretty horrible things, and is why their "defense" is always to say, "Well, your book/religion is just as f***ed up!" Defending my religion by tearing yours down. HAHA. Well, that may or may not be, but it doesn't go very far in convincing me that the Koran is a beautiful book....

And I'm curious. I keep seeing people, from President Bush on down to people on this web site, saying that Islam is a religion of "peace" and
"intelligence." (They say these things so autmatically,btw, that it proves the lie that our media is somehow propagandizing against Islam.) How come none of these claims are ever backed by evidence? What specifically has Islam done in, say, the past 100 years, to justify this claim of being a "peaceful and intelligent" religion?

Some Muslims these days are beginning to remind me of communists who sat idly by as the Soviet Evil Empire murdered 100 million people, in the way that when you pointed out these atrocities to a communist they always simply said, "Oh, well, that wasn't REAL communism, REAL communism would liberate people, and could never ever support evil...." Yeah, well, when Stalin was doing it, your silence was deafening!

> So, the question is, how seriously your average Muslim takes his/her
> Islam? Answer: very seriously indeed.... At least at Arab world. Your Acme
> Christian? Jew? Both Christians and Jews used to be overwhelmingly
> religious/observant/fanatical only three hundreds years ago... LUCKILY
> Well, what about certain American lawyer from Cleveland, Ohio anti-Islamic
> bias? :)

I don't like any religion. But what I think is crucial in the Muslim world is for there to be separation of church and state. IMO, this would be good for Muslims as well as for non-Muslims. After all, in the Muslim world today, you're not just targeted for being an "infidel"; you're also targeted if you're the wrong kind of Muslim. Unfortunately, my understanding of Islam is that it traches against a secular government.

What also bothers me is the way people use "arab" and "Muslim" interchangeably.
There are millions of non-Arab Muslims, and millions of non-Muslim arabs.

Many of the non-Muslim arabs are trapped in Muslim theocracies where they have no rights, but few people seem very concerned about this. Just as few western liberals, who had marches and demonstrations condemning racial apartheid in South Africa seem equally concerned about the equally evil gender apartheid in Muslim run countries. Apparently to be too upset about that would be to "impose our values" on another culture....

>What about pizza parlors of West Bank and Gaza full of
> Palestinian teenagers relaxing and then...

See, this is typical. I've already posted my feelings about Israel here enough, so I'll leave that alone. What is typical is that people don't wanna just say, "Look, there's no debate here, you don't strap bombs on a brainwashed teenager and send that homicide bomber into a restaurant to purposely blow up innocent people. That's pure barbaric savagery, not self-defense." If someone put a similar Israeli committed atrocity in front of my face which similarly targeted innocent people, it would be just as black and white to me.

>Israeli [American
> taxpayers-financed] planes suddenly coming out of the blue to bomb those
> Palestinian citizens as a retaliation for similar atavistically cruel acts
> of Palestinian terror? "Muslim freakazoids" is a cool
> catchphrase, obviously, but Israeli-Palestinian conflict is political in
> its core, not religious! Therefore, solution must be political to save
> lifes of Israeli and Palestinian pizza-eaters and... OK, I promised not to
> touch politics so here I would stop! We are discussing religions there,
> right?

I don't really want to get into the Israel-Palestinian thing again. I'll just point out that when Egypt finally decided to make peace with Israel, there was between Israel and Egypt. Maybe others should follow the example....

> Also, there are half billion Muslims around the world... and believe me, a
> small minority are radical.

A small minority may be the radicals who are ripe to be terrorists, but when you add in the sympathizers, I don't know how "small" this minority is. Maybe I'd have a better idea if there was a large international movement of Muslims to unambiguously condemn Islamic fascism.

>There are Muslim countries like Turkey (free
> westernized country), Malaysia (big way!), Indonesia (in spite of recent
> Bali act), Iran (relatively free elections, progressive president),
> Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan (pro-Western pro-Russian dictators, Russian
> sphere of influence) etc... where there are some significant achievements
> in science and infrastructure and inroads of democracy and industrial
> development recently took place. On the other hand, there are countries
> like Iraq and Saudi Arabia which are regressed in their societal
> development. And there are desperately poor and overpopulated countries
> like Pakistan which became the hotbeds to Islamic militancy. So, dear Oaf,
> all Islamic believers are very different and diverse from each other, with
> different languages, cultures, level of development and different degree
> of westernization et cetera, et cetera... By labeling all those diverse
> peoples and governments "islamic freakazoids", you just show
> your ignorance and utter lack of true info about Islam and Islamic
> peoples...

> Oaf, did you take your body temperature lately? Winters in Cleveland are
> cold... :)

This is an especially cold one. = ( But I'm visiting Florida the weekend after next. = )

> Milocevic's genocide? Hmm, what about Bosnians and Croats genocide against
> ethnic Greek-Orthodox (Pravoslavnyx) Serbs? Again, Oaf, showing your
> Republican Party line... :)

Republcian party line? Um, it was DEMOCRAT BILL CLINTON (with most opposition coming from the RIGHT WING of the GOP) and TONY BLAIR (LABOUR) who rescued Muslims in Kosovo.

> Hmm, I heard huge majority of Kuwaitis and Egyptians love America and
> things American... Perhaps, social statistics is a very inprecise
> science.... If researcher is anti-Arab, he & she would always
> deliberately find an vehemently anti-American sample of populace for
> observation.

This seems like you're burying your head in the sand, not wanting to acknowledge that when populations of people are hit with with state-run media around the clock full of Muslim propaganda that it starts to take hold in people's minds. I read in the NY Times Magazine some months ago about a Palestinian unversity which had a big display in one of their buildings celebrating and making jokes about innocent people blown up in that pizza parlor. I saw on CNN a couple weeks ago about popular children's toys being sold in toy stores in arab countries, such as toy military vehicles with cute little toy Usama bin Ladens standing in the back of them.

>At least, by my private experience, Arabs & Muslims are
> as human as Jews and Blacks and Whites...

No one says they aren't.

Last night I watched a really good WW2 film from the Netherlands, called Soldier of Orange (directed by Paul Verhoeven before he went to Hollywood to make Basic Instinct, Robocop, Starship Troopers...), and it showed the Nazi "Jerries" occupying Holland, with actor Rutger Hauer playing a resistance fighter. Anyway, in various scenes there were interesting details in the backround. For example, on a beach scene, there were Dutch females throwing themselves at Nazi soldiers. And on walls throughout the cities there was anti-Jewish graffiti. Yes, these were humans like anyone else, but significant portions of the population were more than okay with the Nazis. Why was that? Shouldn't such sicknesses in a culture be examined? Even though the Nazis, as depicted in the movie (made by a director who was a kid there at the time), BOMBED the coutry, INVADED the country, OCCUPIED the country, there were all these young Dutch girls turned on by, and f***ing, the Nazis. Very strange, but it happaned in France too.

So humans are weird, ya know. Here's Usama bin Laden, who wants something pretty horrible for Muslims in the Middle East (Talibanization), but a lot of people there are pretty turned on by him. Don't bury your head in the sand about this. I'm not bruying my head in the sand that part of it may be America's fault. But there's a huge percentage of the Muslim world that doesn't even believe Usama bin Laden knocked down the World Trade Center. Who actually believe it was a Jewish plot, and New York Jews were warned to get out the building ahead of time.

>Also, depends how question was
> precisely asked: if an Acme political pollster would ask an average
> Egyptian: "Do you agree with Saddam Hussein that Bush Administration
> is anti-Arab biased and Israel could perpetrate her anti-Palestinian
> atrocities only because American support?", I'm sure around 90% of
> Muslims would say "YES", but it does not mean they support
> Saddam at any degree.

> Oaf, be honest with yourself, you don't know a shit about Islam, you are
> just trying to show up your vaguely Zionist sympathies...

I'm not an expert an Islam. Nor are you. I'm simply waiting for an international movement of Muslims to unambiguously condemn, and separate themselves from, Islamic fascism and terrorism. Like I said, I know plenty of Muslim individuals have done so...as individuals.

> I heard Iranian clergy took this particular "fatwah" (death
> sentence) back under pressure from Iranian secularists...

> As somebody working with movie industry as an computer Cad & PhotoShop
> specialist, I would say Muslim representation in Hollywood is around zero
> (Omar Sheriff :) ), while big guys in Hollywood are nowadays (and always
> were) ... peoples with Eastern European-sounding names like Warner
> brothers, Zanuck, Katzenberg, Geffen, Spielberg....

Oh, here we go, the JEwish run Hollywood.

Well, Hollywood today happens to censor itself so as not to offend Muslims. There's a tremendous political correctness in the air these days that Islam gets a pass, that ISlam is great, that Islam is peaceful.

There was that recent Tom Clancy movie adaptation, which changed the villains from Muslims to Neo-Nazis. I didn't see the movie, but that's what I heard anyway.

You know what's weird is, the biggest Muslim protest was against a movie called The Siege, which is far from an anti-Muslim movie....

>No wonder, there are
> movies so primitively anti-Muslim biased like 'Father of the Bride', not
> to mention anti-Arab "golden oldies" like "Cannonball
> 2"... While Israelis are shown in "heroic" movies like
> 'Exsodus' with Paul Newman and 'Operation Entebbe'... I'm not saying that
> Hollywood doesn't have it's share of glory days and great Jewish-American
> actors & producers, I'm saying, that too many of them automatically
> took Israeli side of the story, hook and swallow...

> Of course there are progressive Muslims out there... The problem is,
> American media is silent about them...

Bullshit!! My god, we heard day after day, ad naseum, after 9/11, that Islam is a "great" religion of "peace." Sales in bookstores of the Koran soared as a result.

>For example, Lebanese public
> opinion condemned the planning of conference of Holocaust deniers in
> Beirut... After many Arab public figures petitioned Lebanese government,
> permission for conference was withdrawn...

> OK. Some of Oaf words are true... Yet, both me and him ought to know about
> Islam much more before judging it.... We, Americans are so self-centered,
> we are easily tempted to stereotype all Islamic world like a den of
> "freakazoids" and sinister murderers. Luckily for all of us, the
> reality is much brighter, and many in the Islamic world, especially among
> college-educated peoples are pro-western and pro-american.... To put all
> Islamic peoples in the roster of "our enemies", as Oaf is doing
> now... is to make the best birthday gift for Bin Laden and his clan of
> real anti-American and anti-humanity murderers and terrorists... In
> opposite, we must to seek friends among Islamic world, only this way the
> victory at War against radical Islamic terror could be achieved!

Anyway, I hope people understand I'm only talking about Islam in this moment in history. I really do think Islamic culture has allowed itself to become dieased in the same way as Nazi Germany was. A lot of this has to do with the lack of freedom and the heavy propaganda in Muslim countries, but that still doesn't explain the strangeness of the way Muslim organizations in free countries react to terrorism. I have no explanation for it, except perhaps people are afraid to acknowledge when something is awry in the faith and culture they have committed their life to. Maybe that also explains why Cardinal Law was so reluctant to acknowledge the problem of child molestation amongst Catholic priests that he actually the American Catholic Church become a child molestation crime ring. Maybe that also explains why it took 50 some years for the Vatican to apoligize for the fact that their Pope during WW2 was a Hitler lover.
 
Quaran and Modern World.

> Yes, I understand that nobody can really DEFEND the Koran, which contains
> some pretty horrible things, and is why their "defense" is
> always to say, "Well, your book/religion is just as f***ed up!"
> Defending my religion by tearing yours down. HAHA. Well, that may or may
> not be, but it doesn't go very far in convincing me that the Koran is a
> beautiful book....

Quaran is definitely a very valuable HISTORICAL document of beautiful Arabic poetry, valuable artifacts, wisdom according to certain era, etc... This book definitely belong to the roster of highest achievements, poetic and philosophical, of the world humanity. Quaran-based culture gave birth to modern mathematics, medicine, engineering... all those achievements of Arab countries during Early Golden Era of Islam at Muslim Spain, North Africa, Middle East... (Remember, Islamic civilization was superior over Europe-based Christianity during Dark Ages, up to 13 or 14 centuries BC) One could also remember about modern Turkey-based Ottoman Empire, which was one of the mightiest superpowers during good 500 years of European history, actually The Superpower for quite a long time. Modern Bulgaria, Greece, Israel/Palestinian State, North Africa: all of those countries were under Istambul Ottoman Muslim rule till very recent times. (Greece got her independence at 1830s, Bulgaria was liberated by Russia at 1860s, modern day Palestine was taken by British from Ottomans at 1918...)

Oaf as a Jewish individual (at least by origin, if not by religion) ought to learn, that at the Renaissance Christian Spain (15 century) Judaism was declared a devils work and Jews were given a choice: be baptized (convert to Christianity) or die. Tens if not hundred thousands of Jews preferred to escape to the Muslim world, where they were given shelter by Islamic rulers of the day... For example, Ottoman Empire took many thousand Jewish refugees under her protection, where those Jewish craftsmen, doctors and merchants became an integral part of Islamic world job market and civic society. Jews (and Christians) were somehow discriminated, true enough, yet there were no Jewish pogroms or slaughters at Muslim world up to 1947, unlike in Christian Spain, France or Germany.

The creation of Israel at 1947 on the historically Arabic soil provoked tremendous frictions between Muslim locals and Jews, especially after huge majority of Sephardic (Arabic-speaking) Jews preferred to emigrate to newly-found Jewish state over giving pledge of allegiance to the young newly-liberated from British colonialism Arab states. There is no excuses for anti-Semitism of say Bashir Assad, Syrian president... Sadly, Arab nationalism and Zionism totally destroyed ages-old culture of mutual-respect, trade and peaceful co-existance between Jews and Muslim world. I wonder how to rebuild those bridges. Poison of Jew-hatred is bad for the Arab world, it sets Arabs back in time many centuries, not to mention it makes them look bad in the eyes of everybody else. The same could be said about Jewish Hollywood deep ignorance of Islam. BTW, huge persentage of Jews in Hollywood is a fact of life, the same as huge persentage of Polish in Electrical Engineering, or Blacks in NBA or Chinese in Computer Science Departments or Russians in mathematics and chess.

Again, my emphasis in Quaran is on HISTORICAL, which means it reflects morals, viewpoints, habits etc... of Arab society circa 7th and 8th centuries after Jesus birth. Women rights or better to say lack of them, property rights, rules of war etc... are the ones which were "mainstream", widely accepted for tribal cattle-raising desert peoples at Saudi Arabian peninsula. That's why I think it is both historically and morally dishonest for Dr Laura and others to put Quaran down by using modern world standards, while feigning ignorance of sexist & homophobic passages in New Testament. Quaran was based at least partially on New Testament book ideas, btw...

So the mere idea of "defending Quaran" from Clevelend Law school student is absurd... :) It is not even a question that quite a few moral & behavorial Quaran guidances are TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE for a modern ENLIGHTENED human being. Quaran is first and foremost a historical heritage document of fine Arab poetry and fiction, some passages of Quaran are peaceful and lyric, some are maniacally militaristic, some passages could be classified as totally despicable by modern day standards, some passages may be SOMEHOW relevant for a modern day man, if properly reinterpreted as an eternal values. The same is true for a Bible, both Old and New Testaments.

The thingie of "holy books" is, there are all kinds of passages for all occasions of life. I'm sure it was easy for Bin Laden to find angry and cruelly simplistic passages of Jihad (War against "infidels") in Quaran, as easy as for Saudi Arabia Berkley-educated Propaganda Ministry employee to find "peaceful" passages for his PR article at say LA Times. (I deliberately substitute "his/her" by assuming that women are being kept from those kinds of jobs at Saudi Arabia.. -:( )

In a sense, I agree with Oaf, that it is a tragedy of Islamic world, that peoples there (hopefully not all of them) ARE REAL DEADLY SERIOUS BELIEVERS and consider Quaran not a man-made historic and literary document, but a divine guidance from heavens...

Some part of Quaran are the total opposite of "peaceful", PC Talk is equally irritating for me... Quaran and Bible are above on-dimensional PC Talk.
Yet, I would just ask Oaf to read Quaran himself (of course on English :), to learn Arabic is would be too much to ask him OR ME :) ) And when Oaf would actually read Quaran, and not what NY Times write about Quaran, he would recognize its poetry & fiction beauty as a literary fact... and its undoubted linguistic if not historic value...

But to use Quaran as a political or family guidance... oh no!!!
One would be insane to live 21 century realities according to the 8 century Saudi desert shepherds' rules... Osama Bin Laden is both a sad and deeply repulsive example of Wakhabist extreme ideology, which interprets Quaran literally, from retrograde guidance of men versus women' code of conduct to the pieces of sickening savagery and crude militarism.

There is an ugly, dark side of Islam for sure... Discrimination of Arab Christians in Iraq and Egypt.

Girls at Medrece (Islamic religious school) at Saudi Arabia, who were kept locked at fire-engulfed building... cause religious fanatics didn't let them out of the building to safety over the fact of girls being without chadras/burcas in front of strange men...

I hope Islamic world future is a secularist one. That's the only road to go, there is no other... Alternative is stagnation and further, bigger gap between East and West... Peoples like Mussaraff and Mubarak understand it. Osama Bin Laden and Saudi ruling dynasty does not...

How soon this possible but not that certain "Arab Economic Miracle" would happen, is hugely dependent upon America and Western World abilities to understand the source of Muslim anger and grievances... Truly enough, huge part of this anger is generated by lies and falsification and self-deceptive ignorance of mullahs and reactionary Arab ruling elites... They fear modernity, they fear western consumer-oriented society, they fear feminism and technology like Internet. They fear their power would slip away...

Yet, as in some cases, like Israeli-Palestinian conflict, this Muslim anger is not as irrational as Oaf would like make us to think, and America FOR STARTERS would easily manage to remove that PARTICULAR source of Arab anger and alienation by introducing the JUST political solution of this certain conflict (non-Zionist state for both Jews and Arabs on the place of modern day Israel), even if it means an alienation of huge part of Jewish and Christian electorate at home.

One must remember countries like Turkey and Azerbaijan, Egypt and Malyasia, small gulf states like Kuwait and Oman, which managed to make a giant jump from backwardness to progress and sophistication while being Islamic culturally. One must remember that Palestinian Arabs are the cream of an Arab intellectual world by the value of an high percent of PhDs and Masters among them... One must remember hundreds of thousands of Muslim science students at American colleges in US and Europe. Yes, I truly believe that majority of Islamic educated classes are in their hearts are pro-Western and they are deeply afraid of Bin Laden Talibanization, indeed they know that they would fell the first victims of Bin Laden Talibanization if anything like this would happen anywhere other then former Afghanistan, god forbid... So again, I believe, Bush peoples utterly lack sophistication and understanding of the Islamic world. (Crazed Iraqi war frenzy... Support of Ariel Sharon over Labor candidate Mitzna of peace in Israel... Lack of efforts to court modern day Iran, lack of support and financial aid to progressives and America-philes like Musharraf of Pakistan and Palestinian new secular leaders like Mirwan Barghouti, failure to disassociate from the reactionary Saudi regime et cetera et cetera..) In result they unwittingly convert the potential friends of America to the reluctant enemies...

We must support westernizers and progressive secularists in the Arab world against Islamist fanatics, September 11 or not... Actually, especially because of September 11.
 
Back
Top Bottom